Think of an action plan in which you were recently involved. Which elements of the planning process were done well? Which ones were done poorly? What was the impact of these strengths and weaknesses on the outcome?
Respond to at least one of your colleagues.
Elements of Planning Process
Planning involves making decisions in advance on the time specific action plan will be done and the personnel responsible for carrying out those operations. It consists of diverse elements which, if followed, result in success but when ignored, the action plan will either fail or result in extra costs being incurred (Ferrell, Fraedrich & Ferrell, 2019). I was recently involved in material aid distribution to the most affected families as a result of coronavirus pandemic. The program involved soliciting funds from friends and local leaders and purchasing materials which were later distributed to the vulnerable families. I was able to identify various planning elements which were done well and others were done poorly.
Forecasting and flexibility are the elements which were more effective when carrying out the charity exercise. Team members were able to predict the number of families which required our supply thus enabling us to solicit enough funds. We were able to purchase enough material supplies for the vulnerable families. Moreover, our plan was not limited food materials unlike other charity programs we have had there before. The plan provided a room for other material like sanitary towels for the ladies in vulnerable families. We were also able to provide bathing soaps to ensure proper hygiene is maintained in the community. Moreover, the set objectives of the exercise were met as highlighted in the plan.
The plan consisted of definite rules and procedures which were to be followed by team members during the exercise. We were supposed to observe coronavirus precaution measures to ensure we do not contract or spread the virus to the community members. However, some overjoyed members of the society were unable to maintain the one meter social distance. This made some of our team members avoid those people which was termed as hostile. Moreover, the team took longer time encouraging and heartening the diseased families thus we were unable to meet our set timeline.
John Fraedrich, Linda Ferrell, & O.C Ferrell, (2019). Business Ethics. Ethical decisions and cases.
You must respond to at least one of your colleagues to receive maximum points.
Please have complete and well thought out responses. I am looking for original input, so please share your thoughts and experiences so we can all learn from them. Please make sure that you back up the posts with factual information from the book, work/life experiences, your online library, etc. Cite any idea that is not “common knowledge”. References must be listed to support the information you provide, and are a requirement of your original discussion post. Superior postings are between 150-200 words —
Discussion Grading Criteria:
Thorough content and robustness of the postings: 40 points possible
Posting on 2 separate days: 20 point possible
Responded to at least one classmate on two separate days: 20 points possible
Spelling/Grammar at the college level: 10 points possible
References to course and/or other sources: 10 points possible
Total: 100 points
Weekly Discussions-Cite at least one reputable source-(Journal Peer Reviewed Journal Article)
Your work should be error-free and clearly organized. Ensure that appropriate APA references and citations are included. Postings are polished, free of errors in mechanics, and is APA compliant. Let everyone be reminded that points would be deducted if you fail to cite sources of the information used. At least one journal source (Peer Reviewed Journal Article ) must be cited to support your ideas. Do not use Wikipedia, Chron, or other articles that are not reputable. Writing from experience is good but will be best when supported with research. The response to the main discussion question of the week must be three paragraphs.